Fonasba circular ; EU ETS Revision: Maritime Stakeholder Perspectives and Invitation for Member Feedback
SİRKÜLER NO: 6.12 / 451-342 = 20/07/2026
Üyesi bulunduğumuz FONASBA' dan 20.07.2026
tarihinde almış olduğumuz e- posta mesajı aşağıdaki
gibidir.
EU ETS Revision: Maritime Stakeholder Perspectives and Invitation for Member Feedback
FONASBA Members’ Briefing
‘’Dear FONASBA and ECASBA Members,
Following the publication of the
European Commission’s proposal for the revision of the EU Emissions Trading
System (EU ETS), we continue to monitor developments closely and to assess the
implications for ship agents, ship brokers, shipping companies, ports and the
wider maritime supply chain.
The revision proposal represents an
important stage in the evolution of Europe’s climate policy framework. As
discussions now progress within the European Parliament and the Council, the
maritime sector is actively evaluating both the opportunities and challenges
arising from the proposed changes.
To support members in understanding
the evolving debate, we have prepared this briefing summarising the initial
reactions from key maritime organisations and associations with whom we engage
closely. Their views reflect the different perspectives of shipowners, ports,
shipbrokers, agents and other maritime stakeholders. While positions vary,
several common themes are emerging, particularly regarding competitiveness,
investment support, carbon leakage, alignment with future IMO measures and the
need to ensure that ETS revenues effectively support maritime decarbonisation.
________________________________________
Reference Material: ETS Review
Presentation and Additional Information
Members may also wish to refer to
the attached presentation:
• “ETS
Review” – 17 July 2026. This presentation provides further background on the
current legislative discussions, the proposed amendments and the potential
consequences for maritime stakeholders.
________________________________________
Summary of Key Maritime
Organisation Positions
European Shipowners (ECSA)
Overall Position
ECSA welcomes several elements of
the European Commission’s proposal but considers that additional improvements
are required to protect the competitiveness of European shipping while
supporting the transition towards zero-emission operations.
Positive Developments Highlighted
• Allocation
of approximately 110 million ETS allowances to support shipping-related
decarbonisation projects.
• Partial
allocation of ETS revenues towards maritime transition measures.
• Increased
support for sustainable maritime fuels.
• Simplification
of reporting requirements between EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.
• Improved
recognition of offshore shipping activities.
Main Concerns
ECSA highlights concerns that:
• Support
mechanisms should remain open to all technologies capable of delivering
meaningful emissions reductions.
• Temporary
derogations for islands, outermost regions and ice-class vessels should receive
stronger consideration.
• Competitiveness
measures must ensure a genuine level playing field across all shipping sectors.
• Greater
clarity is required regarding the future relationship between EU ETS and any
global IMO greenhouse gas framework.
ECSA Message
The proposal represents progress,
but substantially greater reinvestment of ETS revenues into maritime
decarbonisation and clearer alignment with future IMO measures are required.
________________________________________
European Sea Ports Organisation
(ESPO)
Overall Position
ESPO recognises that the
Commission’s proposal addresses some concerns regarding carbon leakage and
competitive distortions affecting European ports, but believes further
assessment is required.
Key Points
Positive developments include:
• Recognition
of the competitive disadvantage experienced by some European ports compared
with neighbouring non-EU ports.
• Measures
intended to reduce evasive port calls.
However, ESPO highlights concerns
regarding:
• The
effectiveness and complexity of anti-evasion measures.
• The
impact of extending ETS coverage to vessels between 400 GT and 5,000 GT.
• The
potential consequences for short-sea shipping and modal shift.
• The
continued need for alignment with future global IMO measures.
ESPO Message
Climate ambition must be
accompanied by measures that prevent the relocation of emissions, cargo flows
and investment outside the European Union.
________________________________________
________________________________________
Perspective from Germany
Shipbrokers Association - Zentralverband Deutscher Schiffsmakler e.V
FONASBA greatly appreciates the
contribution provided by our German members and Dr Alexander Geisler,
representing the views of the German Shipbrokers Association.
Their assessment highlights that
the European Union’s proposals seek to balance climate objectives with
competitiveness, security of supply and industrial investment.
Key elements of the proposal
include:
• A
slower reduction of the emissions cap after 2030.
• Continued
availability of allowances beyond 2040.
• Recognition
of high-quality international emission credits between 2036 and 2040.
• Integration
of permanent CO² removals.
• Adjustments
to the Market Stability Reserve.
• Greater
reinvestment of ETS revenues into decarbonisation sectors, including shipping.
________________________________________
Specific Maritime Provisions
Highlighted
1. Sustainable Maritime Alternative
Propulsion (SMAP)
The proposed SMAP mechanism would
make approximately 110 million allowances available between 2028 and 2040 to
support maritime decarbonisation.
Funding could support:
• Advanced
biofuels.
• E-fuels.
• Electrification.
• Wind-assisted
propulsion.
• Other
low-emission technologies.
The German Shipbrokers Association
notes that this could represent a significant support mechanism, depending on
accessibility and practical implementation.
________________________________________
2. Possible Inclusion of Smaller
Ships
The extension of ETS coverage to
high-emission vessels between 400 and 5,000 GT is identified as a particularly
important issue for:
• Short-sea
shipping.
• Smaller
cargo vessels.
• Feeder
vessels.
• Offshore
and supply vessels.
• Workboats.
• Ferry
and specialised services.
The Association highlights the
potential for additional administrative requirements, documentation obligations
and cost exposure, particularly for smaller operators.
________________________________________
3. Protection Against Traffic
Diversion
The proposed measures to address
carbon leakage and evasive port calls are welcomed in principle, but careful
implementation will be required to avoid creating new market distortions or
excessive complexity.
________________________________________
4. Simplified Reporting
The proposed alignment of ETS and
FuelEU Maritime reporting requirements is considered positive, provided that:
• Digital
systems are standardised.
• Responsibilities
are clearly allocated.
• Smaller
companies receive appropriate support.
________________________________________
Implications for Shipbrokers, Ship
Agents and Maritime Service Providers
The German Shipbrokers Association
highlights several areas where maritime intermediaries may experience indirect
impacts:
• ETS
costs will increasingly need to be reflected in voyage calculations and port
cost assessments.
• Charter
party and agency agreements should clearly define responsibility for emissions
data and allowance costs.
• Smaller
vessel operators may require additional advice and support.
• Port
calls, cargo movements and transhipment patterns may become increasingly
relevant for ETS calculations.
For ship agents and brokers, the
evolving ETS framework reinforces the importance of accurate information
exchange, contractual clarity and close cooperation throughout the maritime
supply chain.
________________________________________
FONASBA/ECASBA Overall Assessment
The revision proposal presents both
opportunities and challenges.
Positive developments include:
• Increased
recognition that ETS revenues should contribute to maritime decarbonisation.
• Creation
of dedicated support mechanisms such as SMAP.
• Improved
coordination between ETS and FuelEU Maritime reporting.
However, concerns remain regarding:
• The
extension of ETS obligations to smaller vessels.
• Administrative
burdens on smaller companies.
• The
accessibility of funding mechanisms.
• The
need to avoid double regulation between EU and future IMO systems.
• Ensuring
that maritime revenues are reinvested effectively into the sector.
The final impact will depend
significantly on:
• The
final definition of vessels covered between 400 and 5,000 GT.
• The
practical accessibility of SMAP funding.
• The
proportion of ETS revenues returned to maritime projects.
• The
outcome of negotiations between European institutions.
________________________________________
FONASBA/ECASB Request for Member
Feedback
As the legislative process
develops, we wish to ensure that the views and experiences of our members are
fully reflected.
We therefore invite all FONASBA and
ECASBA member associations to share their comments, observations and national
perspectives regarding the proposed ETS revisions.
Members are particularly encouraged
to provide views on:
• The
impact of ETS developments on ship agents and ship brokers.
• The
practical consequences for smaller operators and short-sea shipping.
• The
effectiveness of proposed support mechanisms.
• Concerns
regarding competitiveness and carbon leakage.
• National
experiences with implementation challenges.
• Recommendations
that FONASBA should consider in future engagement with European institutions
and maritime stakeholders.
Your feedback will be valuable in
helping FONASBA represent the interests of our global membership and ensure
that the perspective of ship agents and ship brokers remains visible in the
ongoing policy discussions.
We thank all members for their
continued engagement and cooperation.
Yours sincerely,’’
Sayın Üyelerimizin bilgilerine rica ederiz.
Saygılarımızla,
Vapur Donatanları ve Acenteleri Derneği
Emin
EMİNOĞLU
Genel
Sekreter
Ek1:
2027-07-17-TB-ETS-review_0901
Dağıtım: Tüm üyelerimiz
